Question

2.1. evaluate a scientific claim using the process described in the chapter, and find valid sources of information that help lead you to your conclusions. each study is missing a key feature needed to be considered valid science. match each feature to the study description from which it is missing. credentials free from financial incentive or bias peer review a researcher receives funding from dannon to investigate the effects of probiotics on gut health. a college student conducts a research study that is funded by grants and published in a peer - reviewed journal. a full professor at a university conducts a series of studies and pays an independent publisher to publish a book containing the results.

Explanation:

1. Researcher funded by Dannon may have financial bias.
2. College - student study lacks info on researcher credentials.
3. Professor's book not peer - reviewed.

Answer:

1. free from financial incentive or bias
2. credentials
3. peer review