Question

essay questions

• was the us justified or unjustified in entering ww1, why or why not?
• what were the pros and cons of the 1920’s wealth and extravagance?
• what are some ways that the world drastically changed in the 1920’s

Explanation:

Since the user hasn't specified which essay question to address, here's a general approach for one of them, say the first one: "Was the US justified or unjustified in entering WW1, why or why not?"

To determine if the US was justified in entering WWI, we analyze factors like German unrestricted submarine warfare (Lusitania incident, violation of US neutrality), Zimmerman Telegram (German attempt to ally Mexico against US), US economic ties with Allies (loans, trade), and idealistic motives (making world "safe for democracy"). Justification arguments include defending neutral rights, responding to aggression, and aligning with moral/strategic interests. Unjustification arguments could cite initial neutrality, war profiteering, or lack of direct threat before 1917.

Answer:

The US had justifications for entering WWI: German U - boat attacks violated neutral rights (e.g., Lusitania), the Zimmerman Telegram threatened US security, economic ties with Allies (loans, trade) were at risk, and the ideal of "making the world safe for democracy" aligned with values. However, some argue it was unjustified as it initially claimed neutrality and may have entered for economic gain. Ultimately, the combination of violated neutrality, security threats, and ideological motives provides a strong case for justification. (Note: The answer can be adjusted based on a more in - depth analysis of historical evidence and different perspectives.)