Question

it is easier to govern public behavior with statutes rather than deciding every case one at a time by a judge. true false question 154 10 pts a court cannot change the plain meaning of a statute, but it is free to interpret the statute or to declare it unconstituional. true false question 155 10 pts most real property owners hold property once claimed by a king or queen of england, france or spain. true false

Explanation:

• For the first statement: Statutes provide general rules, which offer a more systematic and efficient way to govern public behavior compared to case - by - case judicial decisions.
• For the second statement: Courts are bound by the plain meaning of a statute. They can interpret it within reasonable limits and have the power to declare a statute unconstitutional if it violates the constitution.
• For the third statement: In many common - law countries (originally influenced by England), the concept of real property ownership has historical roots in land grants from monarchs (such as those from England, and in some regions with historical European colonial influence like parts of the Americas influenced by Spain and France).

Answer:

1. True
2. True
3. True