Question

1. what does it mean to not take information at face value?

think about where the information has come from, who is giving the information, and what their motives are
look further into a subject
read very carefully between the lines
investigate the history of the person who is giving the information

Explanation:

To determine the answer, we analyze each option:

• Option 1: Not taking info at face value means critically evaluating its source, the giver, and their motives. This aligns with the concept of critical thinking about information credibility.
• Option 2: "Looking further into a subject" is too vague and doesn't specifically address evaluating the information's context/source.
• Option 3: "Reading between the lines" focuses on interpreting implied meaning, not on assessing the information's origin/motives.
• Option 4: Investigating the person's history is too narrow; not taking info at face value is broader than just the person's history.

So the first option best defines not taking information at face value.

Answer:

A. think about where the information has come from, who is giving the information, and what their motives are