Question

1. suppose you wanted to persuade people that humanity never should detonate another atomic bomb. why would a video presentation be more effective than radio or print?

video of the terrible damage caused by a nuclear blast would affect people more strongly than audio or print only.
audio and print formats are better suited to late - breaking news than to detailed presentations.
multimedia is a more modern format and therefore would hold people’s interest better than radio or print.
an audio - only broadcast could not provide enough factual information to encourage the right decision.

Explanation:

To persuade people against atomic bombs, a video showing the terrible damage of a nuclear blast (visual and auditory impact) is more effective than audio/print. Visuals of destruction can emotionally impact people stronger, making the argument more compelling. The first option (Video of the terrible damage...) explains this as video’s visual evidence (damage) affects people more strongly, leveraging the emotional and sensory impact of video over audio/print. Other options focus on format suitability or multimedia/ audio-only limitations, not the persuasive power of showing damage.

Answer:

A. Video of the terrible damage caused by a nuclear blast would affect people more strongly than audio or print only.