Question

11 multiple choice 1 point \we conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of separate but equal has no place. separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.\ —brown v. board of education (1954) what was the intended effect of this court ruling? \concluimos que en el campo de la educación pública la doctrina de separados las instalaciones educativas son inherentemente desiguales\. —brown contra la junta de educación (1954) ¿cuál fue el efecto pretendido de este fallo de la corte? 〇 require the integration of public schools 〇 require school districts to bus students to \whites only\ schools 〇 to force states to spend an equal amount on each public school student 〇 to establish affirmative action programs in higher education

Explanation:

The Brown v. Board of Education ruling in 1954 declared that "separate but equal" in public education was unconstitutional. The intended effect was to end racial segregation in public schools, which means requiring the integration of public schools. The other options are incorrect: bussing to "whites only" schools would perpetuate segregation, spending equal amounts per student was not the focus, and affirmative action in higher education is a different policy not directly from this ruling.

Answer:

A. require the integration of public schools