Question

as you continue to research your topic, you find an article that investigates your viewpoint and a few other more controversial viewpoints you disagree with. the resource includes a peer - reviewed study and was recently published in a reputable science journal. the content seems logical and is supported by evidence. but you arent sure if you should include it in your research outline. why might this be a valid resource to include in your list? the article has a works cited page with almost a hundred different sources. the article includes scientific research that is high - level and difficult to understand. the article includes a study about a specific claim you agree with. the article uses sound research methods as a credible publisher.

Explanation:

A valid resource often has sound research methods and is published by a credible entity. Having a large number of sources in Works Cited doesn't guarantee validity. High - level research isn't necessarily valid just because it's hard to understand. Agreeing with a specific claim isn't the main factor for a resource's validity.

Answer:

The article uses sound research methods as a credible publisher.