Question

as you continue to research your topic, you find an article that investigates your viewpoint and a few other more controversial viewpoints you disagree with. the resource includes a peer - reviewed study and was recently published in a reputable science journal. the content seems logical and is supported by evidence. but you arent sure if you should include it in your research outline.
why might this be a valid resource to include in your list?
the article includes scientific research that is high - level and difficult to understand.
the article has a works cited page with almost a hundred different sources.
the article includes a study about a specific claim you agree with.
the article uses sound research methods as a credible publisher.

Explanation:

To determine a valid research resource, we analyze each option:

• Option 1: A resource being hard to understand doesn't make it valid for research. Validity is about credibility and relevance, not complexity.
• Option 2: The number of sources in a Works Cited page doesn't guarantee validity. It's about the quality and relevance of the sources, not just quantity.
• Option 3: The article also includes controversial viewpoints the researcher disagrees with, so it's not just about a claim they agree with. Also, including only agreeing claims can lead to bias.
• Option 4: The article has a peer - reviewed study, is published in a reputable science journal, has logical content supported by evidence. This means it uses sound research methods and comes from a credible publisher, which are key factors for a valid research resource.

Answer:

D. The article uses sound research methods as a credible publisher.