Question

which statement would a judicial activist most likely make?
\interpretations of the constitution must change because its authors could not foresee modern life.\
\the court must protect the constitution from changes to its original meaning.\
\government should exercise only those powers specifically named within the constitution.\
\the supreme court must evaluate laws according to the literal language of the constitution.\

Explanation:

Judicial activism involves a more dynamic interpretation of the Constitution. The idea that interpretations must change as the authors couldn't foresee modern life aligns with this approach. The other options (protecting original meaning, limiting government to named powers, literal evaluation) are more in line with judicial restraint.

Answer:

"Interpretations of the Constitution must change because its authors could not foresee modern life."