Question

which social effect may result from adding healthier options to a school lunch program? helping the school board president’s chances of being reelected angering students because of the loss of familiar choices angering school leaders who will have to pay more for the program hurting the school board president’s chances of being reelected

Explanation:

To determine the social effect, we analyze each option:

• Option "helping the school board president’s chances of being reelected": Adding healthier lunch options is unlikely to directly impact reelection chances in a typical social context related to student reactions.
• Option "angering students because of the loss of familiar choices": Students are accustomed to certain lunch options; changing to healthier ones (removing familiar choices) can lead to student dissatisfaction/anger, a plausible social effect.
• Option "angering school leaders who will have to pay more for the program": Adding healthier options doesn't necessarily mean increased costs (or that leaders pay directly), so this is less likely.
• Option "hurting the school board president’s chances of being reelected": Similar to the first option, lunch program changes don't directly tie to reelection harm in a typical social - school lunch context.

Answer:

B. angering students because of the loss of familiar choices