Question

which are the most likely reasons an interpretation of a historical event could change? choose three correct answers.
new opinions are considered.
oversights and errors are corrected.
new technology is applied to evidence.
new evidence is discovered.
pieces of evidence are lost or stolen.

Explanation:

• "Oversights and errors are corrected": Historical research may have initial mistakes; correcting them can alter interpretations.
• "New technology is applied to evidence": New tech (e.g., carbon dating) can re - analyze evidence, leading to new interpretations.
• "New evidence is discovered": New sources or artifacts can provide new info, changing how events are seen. "New opinions" are subjective and not a valid reason for historical interpretation change (history relies on evidence). "Evidence lost/stolen" would hinder, not change, interpretation.

Answer:

B. Oversights and errors are corrected.
C. New technology is applied to evidence.
D. New evidence is discovered.