QUESTION IMAGE
Question
using what you have learned, match each case to the correct supreme court decision.
new york times v. united states, about newspaper articles during the vietnam war
brandenburg v. ohio, about a speech at a ku klux klan rally
engel v. vitale, about prayer in schools
united states v. miller, about regulating gun ownership, and district of columbia v. heller, about owning a personal weapon
tinker v. des moines, about students who wore armbands to protest the vietnam war
texas v. johnson, about a man who burned an american flag
supreme court decision\tcase
speech can only be punished if it causes likely and immediate lawbreaking.\t
students dont lose the right to free speech when they are on school property unless it materially interferes with learning.\t
symbolic speech that is unpopular or offensive is still protected by the first amendment.\t
public schools are government institutions, so they cannot endorse religion by leading prayers.\t
- For "Speech can only be punished if it causes likely and immediate lawbreaking" - This matches Brandenburg v. Ohio (speech at KKK rally, established the "imminent lawless action" test).
- For "Students don't lose the right to free speech when they are on school property unless it materially interferes with learning" - This is Tinker v. Des Moines (students with armbands protesting Vietnam War, established student free speech in schools with material interference test).
- For "Symbolic speech that is unpopular or offensive is still protected by the First Amendment" - This is Texas v. Johnson (flag burning, symbolic speech protected).
- For "Public schools are government institutions, so they cannot endorse religion by leading prayers" - This is Engel v. Vitale (school prayer, established school prayer as unconstitutional state endorsement of religion).
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
- Speech can only be punished if it causes likely and immediate lawbreaking. - Brandenburg v. Ohio, about a speech at a Ku Klux Klan rally
- Students don't lose the right to free speech when they are on school property unless it materially interferes with learning. - Tinker v. Des Moines, about students who wore armbands to protest the Vietnam War
- Symbolic speech that is unpopular or offensive is still protected by the First Amendment. - Texas v. Johnson, about a man who burned an American flag
- Public schools are government institutions, so they cannot endorse religion by leading prayers. - Engel v. Vitale, about prayer in schools