Question

statements supporting minows position
but when television is bad, nothing is worse.
i can assure you that you will observe a vast wasteland.
you will see a procession of game shows, violence, audience participation shows, formula comedies about totally unbelievable families, blood and thunder, mayhem, violence, sadism, murder, western badmen...
there are some fine childrens shows, but they are drowned out in the massive doses of cartoons, violence, and more violence.
factual statements
ours has been called the jet age, the atomic age, the space age. it is also, i submit, the television age.
minows indictment of commercial television launched a national debate about the quality of programming.
:: like everybody, i wear more than one hat. i am the chairman of the fcc.
::
on may 9, 1961, he spoke to 2,000 members of the national association of broadcasters and told them that the daily fare on television was a vast wasteland .

Explanation:

The problem involves analyzing statements related to Minow's position on television and factual statements, likely in the context of media and communication (a subfield of Social Science) or literature/linguistics (subfields of Arts). Since it's about analyzing statements and their support, Media and Communication (Social Science) is more appropriate as it deals with media analysis. The task seems to be identifying which statements belong to which category, but since the question isn't fully clear, assuming it's about categorizing, the relevant subfield is Media and Communication.

Answer:

Media and Communication (subfield of Social Science)