Question

read the passage.
the debate over whether online friendships can rival in - person relationships reflects the evolving nature of human connection. advocates for online friendships point to their inclusivity, allowing people to bond across geographic, cultural, and economic barriers. a 2021 pew research study revealed that fifty - seven percent of teens reported forming strong friendships online, citing shared interests as a key factor. people can socialize and connect with people they feel close to, regardless of location.
critics argue that virtual relationships lack the depth of face - to - face interactions, which provide nonverbal cues and shared experiences that deepen bonds. while its true that physical presence can foster intimacy, dismissing online connections overlooks their unique strengths. digital platforms empower individuals who feel isolated or marginalized to find communities of support. the quality of a friendship should not be measured by physical proximity but by the mutual trust, understanding, and growth it brings.
which statement best summarizes the authors point of view about online friendships compared to in - person friendships?
online friendships are shallow and cannot provide the same depth as in - person friendships because of their lack of face - to - face interactions.
studies have shown that teenagers have a higher success rate than adults in finding lasting friendships online.
while in - person friendships have unique benefits, online friendships can be equally meaningful.
friendships formed online are superior to those formed in - person because they are based on shared interests.

Explanation:

1. Analyze the first option: The passage says critics argue virtual relationships lack depth, but the author notes dismissing online connections overlooks their strengths. So this option reflects critics' view, not the author's.
2. Analyze the second option: The passage only mentions a Pew study about teens forming strong online friendships, with no comparison to adults. So this option is not supported.
3. Analyze the third option: The passage acknowledges in - person friendships can foster intimacy (their unique benefit) and also says online connections have unique strengths and should be judged by mutual trust etc., meaning they can be equally meaningful. This matches the author's view.
4. Analyze the fourth option: The passage doesn't say online friendships are superior; it says both have their merits. So this option is incorrect.

Answer:

C. While in - person friendships have unique benefits, online friendships can be equally meaningful.