QUESTION IMAGE
Question
read this passage from chapter 5 of the prince
but when cities or countries are accustomed to live
under a prince, and his family is exterminated, they,
being on the one hand accustomed to obey and on the
other hand not having the old prince, cannot agree in
making one from amongst themselves, and they do not
know how to govern themselves. for this reason they
are very slow to take up arms, and a prince can gain
them to himself and secure them much more easily. but
in republics there is more vitality, greater hatred, and
more desire for vengeance, which will never permit
them to allow the memory of their former liberty to rest,
so that the safest way is to destroy them or to reside
there.
how does machiavelli work to achieve his primary
purpose to convince readers that a prince must ruin a
conquered republic or live there? select two options.
he lists the types of territories a prince might
conquer.
he describes the role of a ruling family in a
principality.
he explains the roots of rebellion in conquered
republics.
he identifies the characteristics of government in a
republic.
he contrasts the characteristics of principalities and
republics.
To solve this, we analyze each option:
- Option 1: The passage doesn't focus on listing territory types, so eliminate.
- Option 2: The passage isn't about the role of a ruling family, so eliminate.
- Option 3: The passage explains rebellion roots (vitality, hatred, vengeance) in republics, supporting the purpose.
- Option 4: The passage identifies republic government characteristics (more vitality, etc.) to show why a prince must act, supporting the purpose.
- Option 5: The passage contrasts principalities (easy to gain) and republics (need to destroy/reside), supporting the purpose? Wait, no—wait, the primary purpose is to convince about ruining or living in a conquered republic. Let's re - check. The passage contrasts how principalities (under a prince, family exterminated) are easy to take, and republics have more vitality/hatred. So option 5 (contrasting principalities and republics) and option 4 (identifying republic government characteristics) or option 3? Wait, let's re - examine the passage:
The passage says in principalities (cities/countries under a prince, family exterminated) people can't agree to make a new prince, slow to take arms. In republics, there's more vitality, hatred, desire for vengeance. So to convince that a prince must ruin or live there, Machiavelli:
- Option 3: Explains rebellion roots (vitality, hatred, vengeance) in republics—this shows why they need to be ruined or the prince must live there (because of rebellion risk).
- Option 5: Contrasts principalities (easy to control) and republics (harder, so need to ruin or live there)—this helps show why the prince must act differently with republics. Wait, but the options:
Wait the correct options are:
Option 4: "He identifies the characteristics of government in a republic"—the passage identifies that republics have more vitality, hatred, desire for vengeance (characteristics of their government/society) to show why a prince must ruin or live there.
Option 5: "He contrasts the characteristics of principalities and republics"—the passage contrasts how principalities (under a prince, family gone) are easy to take, and republics are not, so a prince must ruin or live there.
Wait, let's check the original question: "convince readers that a prince must ruin a conquered republic or live there".
So:
- Option 3: "explains the roots of rebellion in conquered republics"—the roots are vitality, hatred, vengeance. This explains why a prince must ruin or live there (because of rebellion).
- Option 5: "contrasts the characteristics of principalities and republics"—shows that principalities are easy to control, republics are not, so a prince must act (ruin or live) with republics.
Wait, maybe I made a mistake earlier. Let's re - read the passage:
"in republics there is more vitality, greater hatred, and more desire for vengeance, which will never permit them to allow the memory of their former liberty to rest, so that the safest way is to destroy them or to reside there."
And about principalities: "they, being on the one hand accustomed to obey and on the other hand not having the old prince, cannot agree in making one from amongst themselves, and they do not know how to govern themselves. For this reason they are very slow to take up arms, and a prince can gain them to himself and secure them much more easily."
So Machiavelli contrasts principalities (easy to secure) and republics (hard, so must destroy or reside) (option 5) and identifies republic characteristics (vitality, hatred, vengeance) (option 4? No, option 4 is "characteristics of government in a repu…
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
- He identifies the characteristics of government in a republic, 5. He contrasts the characteristics of principalities and republics