Question

read the excerpt from an interview with peter drucker. giving money is basically passive. in the parable of the good samaritan, the important thing is that the samaritan went back the next day, to make sure that the victim was treated well. he wasnt just giving money; he was giving care. lots of people give money; he gave care; he did something. social entrepreneurs are not satisfied with just giving money. —\a passion for performance,\ philanthropy magazine according to the excerpt, which is an example of how a social entrepreneur could gain satisfaction? \circ by spending free time delivering meals to people who are confined to their homes \circ by becoming a paying member of the citys symphony orchestra \circ by donating money when asked by the cashier at a checkout counter \circ by contributing part of a paycheck to an employers campaign for medical research

Explanation:

The excerpt states social entrepreneurs are unsatisfied with just giving money; they give care/do something active. Option A involves active, direct care (delivering meals), unlike the other options which are passive (donating money/joining a group without direct care). This aligns with the example of the Good Samaritan providing ongoing care rather than just money.

Answer:

A. by spending free time delivering meals to people who are confined to their homes