the nuclear equation is incomplete. ( ce{_{94}^{239}pu + _{0}^{1}n - _{46}^{160}zr + ? + 2_{0}^{1}n} ) what particle completes the equation? ( \boldsymbol{circ} ce{_{54}^{138}xe} ) ( \boldsymbol{circ} ce{_{54}^{138}xe} ) ( \boldsymbol{circ} ce{_{54}^{118}xe} ) ( \boldsymbol{circ} ce{_{52}^{138}te} )

Question

the nuclear equation is incomplete. ( ce{_{94}^{239}pu + _{0}^{1}n -> _{46}^{160}zr + ? + 2_{0}^{1}n} ) what particle completes the equation? ( \boldsymbol{circ} ce{_{54}^{138}xe} ) ( \boldsymbol{circ} ce{_{54}^{138}xe} ) ( \boldsymbol{circ} ce{_{54}^{118}xe} ) ( \boldsymbol{circ} ce{_{52}^{138}te} )

Accepted Answer

To solve for the missing particle in the nuclear equation, we use the conservation of mass number (top number) and atomic number (bottom number).

### Step 1: Conservation of Mass Number
The total mass number on the left side is:
Mass number of $ \ce{_{94}^{239}Pu} $ + Mass number of $ \ce{_{0}^{1}n} $
$ 239 + 1 = 240 $

The total mass number on the right side (excluding the missing particle) is:
Mass number of $ \ce{_{46}^{160}Zr} $ + (7 × Mass number of $ \ce{_{0}^{1}n} $)
$ 160 + (7 × 1) = 167 $

Let the mass number of the missing particle be $ A $. Then:
$ 167 + A = 240 $
$ A = 240 - 167 = 73 $? Wait, no—wait, the original equation might have a typo? Wait, recheck:

Wait, the left side: $ \ce{_{94}^{239}Pu} + \ce{_{0}^{1}n} $. Right side: $ \ce{_{46}^{160}Zr} +? + 7\ce{_{0}^{1}n} $.

Wait, mass number conservation:
Left: $ 239 + 1 = 240 $
Right: $ 160 + A + (7 × 1) = 160 + A + 7 = 167 + A $
Thus, $ 167 + A = 240 \implies A = 73 $? But the options have mass numbers 138, 138, 118, 138. Wait, maybe the original equation is $ \ce{_{94}^{235}Pu} $? No, the user’s equation is $ \ce{_{94}^{239}Pu} $. Wait, perhaps I misread the zirconium. Let’s check atomic numbers.

### Step 2: Conservation of Atomic Number
Atomic number of $ \ce{_{94}^{239}Pu} $ is 94. Atomic number of $ \ce{_{0}^{1}n} $ is 0. So left atomic number: $ 94 + 0 = 94 $.

Right side: Atomic number of $ \ce{_{46}^{160}Zr} $ is 46. Atomic number of $ \ce{_{0}^{1}n} $ is 0. Let the atomic number of the missing particle be $ Z $. Then:
$ 46 + Z + (7 × 0) = 46 + Z $

By conservation: $ 46 + Z = 94 \implies Z = 94 - 46 = 48 $? No, the options have $ Z = 54 $ (for Xe, Te has $ Z=52 $). Wait, maybe the original equation is $ \ce{_{92}^{235}U} $? No, the user wrote $ \ce{_{94}^{239}Pu} $.

Wait, the options are:
1. $ \ce{_{54}^{138}Xe} $
2. $ \ce{_{54}^{138}Xe} $ (same as first)
3. $ \ce{_{54}^{118}Xe} $
4. $ \ce{_{52}^{138}Te} $

Let’s recalculate mass number:

Left: $ 239 + 1 = 240 $
Right: $ 160 + A + 7(1) = 167 + A $
So $ A = 240 - 167 = 73 $? No, that doesn’t match. Wait, maybe the equation is $ \ce{_{94}^{239}Pu} + \ce{_{0}^{1}n}
ightarrow \ce{_{46}^{160}Zr} +? + 2\ce{_{0}^{1}n} $ (typo: 2 instead of 7)? Let’s check:

Left mass: $ 239 + 1 = 240 $
Right mass: $ 160 + A + 2(1) = 162 + A $
$ A = 240 - 162 = 78 $? No.

Alternatively, maybe the zirconium is $ \ce{_{40}^{160}Zr} $? Then atomic number 40.

Left atomic number: 94
Right atomic number: 40 + Z + 7(0) = 40 + Z
$ Z = 94 - 40 = 54 $ (Xe has Z=54). Then mass number:

Left: 239 + 1 = 240
Right: 160 + A + 7(1) = 167 + A
$ A = 240 - 167 = 73 $? No, but Xe-138: mass 138. Wait, maybe the left mass number is 235? $ 235 + 1 = 236 $. Right: 160 + A + 7(1) = 167 + A. $ A = 236 - 167 = 69 $. No.

Wait, the options have mass 138. Let’s check $ \ce{_{54}^{138}Xe} $: mass 138, atomic 54.

Left: $ 239 + 1 = 240 $
Right: 160 (Zr) + 138 (Xe) + 7(1) (neutrons) = 160 + 138 + 7 = 305. No, that’s too big.

Wait, maybe the equation is $ \ce{_{94}^{239}Pu} + \ce{_{0}^{1}n}
ightarrow \ce{_{46}^{160}Zr} +? + 2\ce{_{0}^{1}n} $ (2 neutrons). Then:

Left mass: 239 + 1 = 240
Right mass: 160 + A + 2(1) = 162 + A
$ A = 240 - 162 = 78 $. No.

Alternatively, maybe the original equation is $ \ce{_{92}^{235}U} + \ce{_{0}^{1}n}
ightarrow \ce{_{46}^{160}Zr} +? + 2\ce{_{0}^{1}n} $. Then:

Left mass: 235 + 1 = 236
Right mass: 160 + A + 2(1) = 162 + A
$ A = 236 - 162 = 74 $. No.

Wait, the options include $ \ce{_{54}^{138}Xe} $. Let’s check atomic number 54 (Xe) and mass 138.

Left atomic number: 94 (Pu)
Right atomic number: 46 (Zr) + 54 (Xe) + 7(0) (neutrons) = 100. No, 46 + 54 = 100 ≠ 94.

Wait, maybe the zirconium is $ \ce{_{40}^{160}Zr} $ (atomic 40). Then:

Right atomic number: 40 (Zr) + 54 (Xe) + 7(0) = 94 (matches Pu’s atomic number 94).

Now mass number:

Left: 239 (Pu) + 1 (n) = 240
Right: 160 (Zr) + 138 (Xe) + 7(1) (n) = 160 + 138 + 7 = 305. No, that’s not equal.

Wait, maybe the number of neutrons is 2, not 7. Then:

Right mass: 160 + 138 + 2(1) = 300. No.

Alternatively, left mass number is 238: $ 238 + 1 = 239 $. Right: 160 + 138 + 7 = 305. No.

Wait, perhaps the equation is $ \ce{_{94}^{239}Pu} + \ce{_{0}^{1}n}
ightarrow \ce{_{46}^{160}Zr} + \ce{_{54}^{138}Xe} + 3\ce{_{0}^{1}n} $. Then:

Mass: 239 + 1 = 240; 160 + 138 + 3(1) = 301. No.

This is confusing. Wait, the key is conservation of atomic and mass numbers. Let’s list the options:

1. $ \ce{_{54}^{138}Xe} $: Z=54, A=138
2. $ \ce{_{54}^{138}Xe} $: same as 1
3. $ \ce{_{54}^{118}Xe} $: Z=54, A=118
4. $ \ce{_{52}^{138}Te} $: Z=52, A=138

Let’s recalculate with the given equation (assuming the left is $ \ce{_{94}^{239}Pu} + \ce{_{0}^{1}n} $, right is $ \ce{_{46}^{160}Zr} +? + 7\ce{_{0}^{1}n} $):

- Atomic number: $ 94 = 46 + Z + 7(0) \implies Z = 94 - 46 = 48 $. But none of the options have Z=48. So maybe a typo in the equation.

Wait, maybe the zirconium is $ \ce{_{40}^{160}Zr} $ (Z=40). Then:

$ 94 = 40 + Z + 7(0) \implies Z = 54 $ (Xe has Z=54). Now mass number:

Left: $ 239 + 1 = 240 $
Right: $ 160 + A + 7(1) = 167 + A $
So $ A = 240 - 167 = 73 $. But Xe-73 doesn’t exist. The options have A=138. So maybe the left mass number is $ 239 + 1 = 240 $, and the right has $ 160 + 138 + 2(1) = 300 $. No.

Wait, maybe the equation is $ \ce{_{92}^{235}U} + \ce{_{0}^{1}n}
ightarrow \ce{_{40}^{160}Zr} +? + 2\ce{_{0}^{1}n} $. Then:

Atomic number: $ 92 = 40 + Z + 2(0) \implies Z = 52 $ (Te has Z=52). Mass number: $ 235 + 1 = 236 $; $ 160 + A + 2(1) = 162 + A \implies A = 236 - 162 = 74 $. No.

Alternatively, $ \ce{_{92}^{235}U} + \ce{_{0}^{1}n}
ightarrow \ce{_{40}^{160}Zr} + \ce{_{52}^{138}Te} + 3\ce{_{0}^{1}n} $. Mass: 235+1=236; 160+138+3=301. No.

This is tricky. Wait, the most probable option is $ \ce{_{54}^{138}Xe} $ (first option) because Xe has atomic number 54, and if we assume a typo in the zirconium’s atomic number (maybe 40 instead of 46), then Z=54 matches. So the answer is $ \boldsymbol{\ce{_{54}^{138}Xe}} $ (first option).

# Answer:
$ \boldsymbol{\ce{_{54}^{138}Xe}} $ (the first option: $ \ce{_{54}^{138}Xe} $)

Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

QUESTION IMAGE

Question

Explanation:

Step 1: Conservation of Mass Number

Step 2: Conservation of Atomic Number

Answer: