Question

jefferson was clearly uncomfortable with the concept of __________________ that had been established as precedent in the ________________ case. he did not trust the supreme court to decide whether or not laws were __________________.
options:

1. judicial restraint... barron v. baltimore... appropriate
2. judicial activism... gibbons v. ogden... justiciable
3. judicial review... marbury v. madison... constitutional
4. judicial implementation... dred scott v. sanford... legal

Explanation:

The question is about U.S. history and constitutional law, specifically Thomas Jefferson's view on judicial power. The concept of judicial review was established in Marbury v. Madison, and the Supreme Court's role in judicial review is to decide if laws are constitutional. The other options' cases or concepts don't match: Barron v. Baltimore is about state governments and the Bill of Rights, Gibbons v. Ogden is about interstate commerce, and "judicial implementation" or "justiciable" don't fit the context of law constitutionality review.

Answer:

C. judicial review... Marbury v. Madison... constitutional