Question

in the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. determine the type of plagiarism by clicking the appropriate radio button.
original source material
while solitary negative reactions or unjustified suggestions for change have the potential to dissipate discourse rather than build it, the pattern analysis shows that the anonymous condition seemed to provide a safe explorative space for learners to try out more reasons for their multiple solutions. teachers will rarely give anonymous feedback, but the experience of giving anonymous feedback may open a social space where learners can try out the reasons for their suggestions.
references:
howard, c. d., barrett, a. f., & frick, t. w. (2010). anonymity to promote peer feedback: pre - service teachers’ comments in asynchronous computer - mediated communication. journal of educational computing research, 43(1), 89 - 112.
student version
in their study of anonymity in an online peer feedback activity, the authors found that, under conditions of anonymity, learners seemed more inclined to provide reasons to back up their suggestions (howard, barrett, & frick, 2010). getting both suggestions and the reasons for the suggestions would be welcome in the feedback i receive from peers or my instructors. seeing the reasons would help me know that the suggestions have been thought through (even if i dont always agree with them).
references:
howard, c. d., barrett, a. f., & frick, t. w. (2010). anonymity to promote peer feedback: pre - service teachers’ comments in asynchronous computer - mediated communication. journal of educational computing research, 43(1), 89 - 112.

Explanation:

The student version does not closely paraphrase the original source material. It has different ideas and focuses on the student's perspective about feedback received. However, it does correctly cite the source. This is not word - for - word plagiarism as the text is not copied verbatim, and it is not paraphrasing plagiarism as it does not closely mimic the original's structure and ideas. Since the student has made an original contribution while properly citing the source, this is not plagiarism.

Answer:

No plagiarism