Question

above: outline 5 districts
– each with 10 boxes- that
would result in the
“gray-leaning” political
party winning two of the

above: outline 5 districts
– each with 10 boxes- that
would result in the
“gray-leaning” political
party winning three of the

Explanation:

Step1: Analyze the Right Graph

The right graph has a 2 - column (width) by 10 - row (height) shaded area? Wait, no, let's count the number of boxes. Wait, the task is to outline 5 districts each with 10 boxes for the "gray - leaning" party to win three. Let's look at the right graph: the shaded region is 2 columns (let's say columns 1 and 2) and 10 rows? Wait, no, let's count the number of cells. Each district should have 10 boxes. Let's see the right graph: the shaded area is 2 columns (width) and 10 rows (height), so 210 = 20? No, wait, maybe the grid is 5 columns (since from 3 to 8, maybe 5 columns: 3 - 4, 4 - 5, 5 - 6, 6 - 7, 7 - 8? Wait, no, the x - axis is marked 3,4,5,6,7,8. So the grid has columns corresponding to these. Let's assume each column is a unit. The right graph's shaded area is 2 columns (say columns 1 and 2, from left) and 10 rows. Wait, no, the problem is about gerrymandering or district drawing. The right graph's shaded region is a 2 - column (width) by 10 - row (height) rectangle? Wait, no, let's count the number of boxes. If we need 5 districts each with 10 boxes, the right graph's shaded area: let's see, the height is 10 rows (from top to bottom, 10 horizontal lines, so 10 rows). The width: the shaded area is 2 columns (since it's two columns wide). Wait, no, maybe the right graph's shaded region is a 2 - column (width) and 10 - row (height) rectangle, which has 210 = 20 boxes? No, that can't be. Wait, maybe the grid is 5 columns (5 districts) and 10 rows. So each district is 1 column by 10 rows (10 boxes). But the right graph's shaded area is 2 columns by 10 rows. Wait, no, the problem says "Outline 5 districts – each with 10 boxes - that would result in the 'gray - leaning' political party winning three of the...". Wait, maybe the right graph is the one where we can form three districts of 10 boxes each for the gray party. Wait, the left graph has a more gerrymandered (zig - zag) boundary, while the right graph has a straight - line (2 - column) boundary. Wait, maybe the correct graph for the "gray - leaning" party to win three is the right graph? Wait, no, let's re - read. The right graph's caption: "Outline 5 districts – each with 10 boxes - that would result in the 'gray - leaning' political party winning three of the...". Wait, maybe the right graph's shaded area is a 2 - column (width) and 10 - row (height) region, and if we divide it into districts, but no. Wait, maybe the answer is the right graph. Wait, the question is probably about identifying the graph where the district drawing for the gray - leaning party to win three. The right graph has a more compact (2 - column) shaded area, which can be divided into two districts (2*10 = 20) but no, we need 5 districts. Wait, I think I'm overcomplicating. The problem is likely a multiple - graph question (three graphs? But the image shows two main graphs: left with purple outline, right with shaded). Wait, the user says "the graph on the...", maybe the right graph is the correct one for the "gray - leaning" party to win three. So the correct graph is the Right Graph.

Answer:

The Right Graph