Question

why did people disagree on the origins (how it started) of great zimbabwe? does this seem fair? why or why not? ready? enter your answer here

Explanation:

1. Disagreements on Origins: During colonial times, some Europeans (due to racial biases) refused to believe that Africans (the Shona people) could build Great Zimbabwe. They proposed false theories like it was built by Phoenicians, Arabs, or other non - African groups. This was rooted in the racist idea that African civilizations were "primitive" and couldn't create such advanced architecture.
2. Fairness: This is unfair. The evidence (like Shona cultural continuity, local building techniques, and archaeological finds of local artifacts) strongly supports that Great Zimbabwe was built by the Shona. The disagreements were based on prejudice, not facts, so they undermined the achievements of African civilizations.

Answer:

• People disagreed on Great Zimbabwe's origins mainly due to colonial - era racial biases. Europeans, influenced by the belief that African societies were "uncivilized," denied that the local Shona people could build it and falsely attributed its creation to non - African groups (e.g., Phoenicians, Arabs).
• This is unfair. The disagreement was based on prejudice, not evidence. Archaeological and cultural evidence (e.g., Shona building traditions, local artifacts) shows the Shona built it, so the biased denials ignored facts and devalued African civilizational achievements.