Question

which statement primarily appeals to pathos, or emotion, to support the position that celebrities should stay out of politics?
as very few celebrities have any political experience at all, their involvement in politics can be a narcissistic farce, turning the focus on their public personas rather than the real issues at hand.
as an elected official who has spent her entire career studying the issues, i am disconcerted by the fact that celebrities can garner support for their political beliefs merely because of their name recognition.
we do not ask celebrities for legal advice or medical advice because we know that they dont have the training or experience of lawyers or doctors. by the same logic, we should not expect celebrities to have the expertise of professional politicians.

Explanation:

The second statement uses the word "disconcerted" (an emotional response) from an elected official. This appeals to emotion (pathos) by showing a negative emotional reaction to celebrities' political influence. The first statement uses "narcissistic farce" which is more of a value - judgment (could be seen as logos - based on the lack of experience). The third statement is a logical analogy (logos) comparing different types of expertise.

Answer:

The second statement: "As an elected official who has spent her entire career studying the issues, I am disconcerted by the fact that celebrities can garner support for their political beliefs merely because of their name recognition."