Question

use the discussion to answer the question.
what does miguel do in paragraph 7?
(1 point)

he adds a justification to his argument in
favor of mandatory volunteer work.

he uses inflammatory language that
prevents the discussion from going
further.

he gives a summary of the discussion
and makes sure its accurate.

he acknowledges that they disagree on
every point.

Explanation:

To answer, we analyze each option:

• Option 1: If Miguel is arguing for mandatory volunteer work, adding a justification (like reasons/evidence) to his argument fits.
• Option 2: Inflammatory language would be hostile, but the question is about his action in para 7 (likely constructive, so this is out).
• Option 3: Summarizing the discussion isn’t typical if he’s making an argument; he’s more likely advancing his stance.
• Option 4: "Disagree on every point" is extreme; discussions usually have some common ground or partial agreement, so this is unlikely.

So the most logical is that he adds a justification to his argument for mandatory volunteer work.

Answer:

He adds a justification to his argument in favor of mandatory volunteer work.