Question

question 3
1 pts

all the following are important when considering the price of progress except:

• the feelings and thoughts of those whose lives or way of life are being sacrificed.
• cost-benefit calculations based on how much wealth is being gained by the \advanced\ preponderant side.
• how can historians or scholars be sure that who or what are being sacrificed are \inferior\?
• is outrage part of the progress in question?

Explanation:

Analyze the core question

The question asks us to identify which option is NOT important when evaluating the "price of progress" from a critical historical perspective.

Evaluate the first option

Using Historical Methodology, we examine the human cost of historical developments. The feelings and thoughts of those whose lives or way of life are being sacrificed are central to this analysis.

Evaluate the second option

Using Howard Zinn Historiography, we critique traditional narratives that justify suffering for "progress." Cost-benefit calculations based on wealth gained by the dominant or "advanced" side represent the exact utilitarian justification that critical historians reject as a valid measure of progress.

Evaluate the third option

Using Historiographical Analysis, we must question the ideological assumptions of progress, such as the classification of victims as "inferior" to justify their displacement or destruction.

Evaluate the fourth option

We consider whether outrage itself is an inherent part of the historical progress in question, which is a key conceptual inquiry when analyzing historical conflicts and social movements.

Answer:

• (A) The feelings and thoughts of those whose lives or way of life are being sacrificed.
• (B) Cost-benefit calculations based on how much wealth is being gained by the "advanced" preponderant side. (Correct answer)
• (C) How can historians or scholars be sure that who or what are being sacrificed are "inferior"?
• (D) Is outrage part of the progress in question?