Question

prompt: james bessen and claudia alarcon both present an argument about the effects of automation in the workplace. how are these two arguments different regarding their position? use the following topic sentence and concluding sentence. copy and paste them into your own google doc. only your chunks will be graded. format: copy this topic sentence: in “the automation paradox” by james bessen and “heads up, humans” by claudia alarcon, both authors present an argument about the effects of automation on employment. four - sentence chunk 1: “the automation paradox” ● in your own words, state bessen’s position on how automation affects employment. ● paraphrased context and direct evidence with a citation (cite page numbers) ● explain how this is a positive thing for workers. ● this is another analysis sentence to further explain sentence three. *students with shortened assignments as an accommodation may skip sentence 4 of chunk 1.

Explanation:

To answer this, one must first understand Bessen's and Alarcon's positions on automation in the workplace from their respective works. Then compare the two positions to identify differences. For Bessen's part in "The Automation Paradox", his stance on automation - employment effects needs to be stated in one's own words, along with providing context, evidence, and analysis of its positive aspects for workers. However, without access to the full - text of the works to extract details such as page numbers for evidence, a complete response is limited.

Answer:

No specific answer can be provided without access to the full texts of "The Automation Paradox" by James Bessen and "Heads Up, Humans" by Claudia Alarcon to extract the necessary information about their positions.