Question

1 multiple choice 3 points which statement correctly evaluates how effectively the author supports the central idea that the enslaved people in the identified areas should be freed? he supports the central idea effectively with evidence from the constitution. he supports the central idea ineffectively by not providing evidence to support this central idea. he supports the central idea ineffectively by providing evidence that is not relevant to the topic. he supports the central idea effectively with an emotional appeal for human dignity. clear my selection

Explanation:

To determine the correct answer, we analyze each option:

• Option 1: If the author used Constitutional evidence, but without context (like the text's actual content), we can't assume this.
• Option 2: If the author didn't provide evidence to support freeing enslaved people, this would mean ineffective support.
• Option 3: Irrelevant evidence would be a different flaw, not matching "no evidence" as in Option 2.
• Option 4: Emotional appeal for human dignity is a type of support, but again, without text context, we assume the key is about evidence presence. Typically, in such questions (e.g., analyzing an author's support), if the author fails to give evidence, Option 2 is correct as it states the author supports ineffectively by not providing evidence.

Answer:

B. He supports the central idea ineffectively by not providing evidence to support this central idea.