Question

1 multiple choice 1 point a secondary source might be... a summary of other primary sources. the reprinting of a primary source. an authors reimagining of an event. 2 multiple choice 1 poin a primary source might be the main source used for a paper. a source thats at least book - length. a first - hand account of an event. 3 multiple choice 1 point journal editors are made up of: an author formerly published in the journal. learners studying to join the journals field. scholars in the field the journal focuses on. 4 multiple choice 1 point the peers who participate in a scholarly articles peer - review are: the authors enemies who are willing to note any possible errors in the paper. other experts in the field of the scholarly article, generally chosen by its editor. individuals who are non - experts and can help make the paper less confusing.

Explanation:

• Question 1: A secondary source interprets or analyzes primary sources. A summary of other primary sources fits this definition. Reprinting a primary source (still a primary source) and an author’s reimagining (could be a creative work, not a typical secondary source) are incorrect.
• Question 2: A primary source is an original document or firsthand account. “The main source used for a paper” is about usage, not nature. “At least book - length” is a false criterion.
• Question 3: Journal editors are typically scholars in the journal’s field to ensure quality and expertise. An author published in the journal (may not have editorial skills) and learners (lack expertise) are wrong.
• Question 4: Peer - review peers are experts in the field (chosen by editors usually) to evaluate scholarly work. Enemies (biased) and non - experts (lack knowledge) are incorrect.

Answer:

1. A. A summary of other primary sources.
2. C. A first - hand account of an event.
3. C. Scholars in the field the journal focuses on.
4. B. Other experts in the field of the scholarly article, generally chosen by its editor.