Question

gangsters warnings to migrants not to go to the police are ruthlessly enforced. julio césar cancino gálvez, with grupo beta sur, recalls how a group of about thirty migrants at the tapachula train station asked him why the authorities werent clamping down on the gangsters. cancino told them they needed witnesses. he urged the migrants to step forward and report abuses. one nineteen-year-old honduran in the crowd spoke up. he described his assailant in detail. hours later, the red cross asked cancino if he could help an injured migrant. it was the same honduran teenager. his right ribs were broken. his entire chest and face were badly bruised. he spoke slowly, in a whisper, clasping his chest. two gangsters had overheard his description and kicked him mercilessly. next time, we kill you, the gangsters told him. the teenager, afraid for his life, asked to be deported. the underlined sentences demonstrate characterization. how does this technique support the authors purpose? it shows that the refugees were strong and unafraid of the gangsters. it shows how violent the situation was and how scared enrique was. it shows how hopeful the refugees were about reaching the united states. it shows that enrique was quiet, shy, and preferred not to interact with others. - enriques journey,

Explanation:

The underlined sentences describe the physical harm (broken ribs, bruised chest and face) and the fearful state (whispering, clasping chest) of the migrant. This vividly portrays the violent situation (gangsters' brutal attack) and the fear it instills. The other options are incorrect: the migrant was not shown as strong and unafraid (he was injured and scared), there's no indication of hope about reaching the US, and there's no basis for saying Enrique (assuming the migrant is related to Enrique in the context of the book) was quiet, shy, and preferred not to interact (the focus is on the violence and fear).

Answer:

It shows how violent the situation was and how scared Enrique was.