Question

1. choose the letter before the highlighted phrase that helps the reader understand the meaning of the word inadvertently in paragraph 11. many people who upload their dna into online databases are a interested in knowing about their distant cousins. b or what percentage cherokee they are. c they arent trying to inadvertently d rat themselves out to the cops 6. what is kayes main point about comparing dna to fingerprints? a. dna and fingerprints are exactly the same because they both identify only one person. b. the comparison to fingerprints is weak because dna can also connect police to a suspects relatives. c. fingerprints are more reliable than dna in solving crimes d. dna is less useful than fingerprints because it cannot be stored in a central repository 7. read paragraph 15. how does the author organize the information in this paragraph? a. he compares the results of two court cases. b. he explains the causes and effects of two court cases. c. he gives detailed accounts of court cases related to technology. d. he uses court cases to answer a question he poses earlier in the text.

Explanation:

For question 5, we need to find context - clues for the word "inadvertently". For question 6, we analyze Kaye's view on DNA - fingerprint comparison based on the given statements. For question 7, we determine the author's organizational method in paragraph 15 by understanding the content.
For question 5, without the full context of the highlighted phrase, we can't answer precisely. For question 6, comparing DNA to fingerprints, the key is that DNA can connect to relatives which makes the comparison weak as fingerprints only identify one person directly. For question 7, we need to read paragraph 15 to see if it's comparing cases, explaining cause - effect, giving details or answering a question.

Answer:

1. No answer due to lack of context.
2. b. The comparison to fingerprints is weak because DNA can also connect police to a suspect's relatives.
3. No answer without reading paragraph 15.