QUESTION IMAGE
Question
the charge inside a conductor (hw22)
figure: a spherical cavity is hollowed out of the interior of a neutral conducting sphere. at the center of the cavity is a point charge, of positive charge ( q ).
part f: the total surface charge on the exterior of the conductor, ( q_{\text{ext}} ):
options: would change, would not change
(buttons: view available hint(s), submit)
part g: the electric field within the cavity, ( e_{\text{cav}} ):
options: would change, would not change
(buttons: submit, request answer)
part h: the electric field outside the conductor, ( e_{\text{ext}} ):
(text cut off, similar structure with options)
Part F:
For a neutral conducting sphere with a charge \( +q \) at the cavity center, the interior surface of the conductor will have \( -q \) (by electrostatic induction), and the exterior surface will have \( +q \) (since the conductor is neutral initially). If the charge inside the cavity or the cavity's position changes (but the net charge inside the conductor - cavity system related to exterior? Wait, no— the exterior charge depends on the net charge enclosed by a Gaussian surface outside the conductor. The conductor's exterior charge is determined by the charge inside the cavity (inducing \( +q \) on exterior, as the conductor is neutral, so interior surface \( -q \), exterior \( +q \)). If the cavity's charge or its position (but the charge is at center, symmetric) — wait, the exterior surface charge: the electric field outside the conductor is like a point charge \( +q \) at the center (by Gauss's law, since inside the conductor \( E = 0 \), so a Gaussian surface outside encloses \( +q \) (from exterior surface, as interior surface has \( -q \) and cavity has \( +q \), total enclosed by exterior Gaussian is \( +q - q + q = +q \)? Wait, no: the conductor is neutral, cavity has \( +q \), so interior surface (of cavity) has \( -q \), exterior surface has \( +q \) (to keep conductor neutral: \( -q + q_{\text{ext}} = 0 \implies q_{\text{ext}} = +q \)). Now, if the cavity's charge or its position (but the charge is a point charge at center, symmetric) — does the exterior surface charge depend on the cavity's position? No, because the electric field inside the conductor is zero, so the charge on the exterior surface is determined by the net charge enclosed by a Gaussian surface outside the conductor, which is the charge inside the cavity (since the interior surface charge and cavity charge cancel for the region inside the conductor, but outside, the exterior surface charge is equal to the cavity charge (because conductor is neutral: \( q_{\text{cavity}} + q_{\text{interior surface}} + q_{\text{exterior surface}} = 0 \), and \( q_{\text{interior surface}} = -q_{\text{cavity}} \), so \( q_{\text{exterior surface}} = q_{\text{cavity}} \)). So if the cavity's charge (magnitude, sign) doesn't change, and the conductor is still neutral, the exterior surface charge \( q_{\text{ext}} \) would not change. Wait, but the question: "The total surface charge on the exterior of the conductor, \( q_{\text{ext}} \): would change / would not change". Wait, maybe the scenario is: if we move the cavity's charge (but it's a point charge at center, or maybe if the cavity's shape changes? No, the problem is about a spherical cavity. Wait, the key is: the exterior surface charge of a conductor with a cavity and an internal charge depends only on the net charge inside the conductor (cavity + conductor's charge). Since the conductor is neutral, and the cavity has \( +q \), the exterior surface must have \( +q \) (to make the total charge of conductor + cavity: \( +q \) (cavity) + 0 (conductor) = \( +q \), so exterior surface has \( +q \)). If the cavity's charge (magnitude, sign) doesn't change, and the conductor remains neutral, the exterior surface charge won't change. So the answer is "would not change".
The electric field inside the cavity: for a spherical cavity with a point charge at the center, the electric field inside the cavity is determined by the point charge \( +q \) (using Coulomb's law, \( \vec{E} = \frac{kq}{r^2} \hat{r} \)). The conducting material (between cavity and exterior) has \( E = 0 \) in electrostatic equilibrium. The charge on the interior surface of the conductor is \( -q \), but this charge is uniformly distributed (since the cavity is spherical and charge is at center), so its electric field inside the cavity cancels out? Wait, no: the electric field inside the cavity is due to the point charge \( +q \) and the induced charge on the cavity's surface. But for a spherical cavity with a point charge at the center, the induced charge on the cavity's surface is uniform (spherical symmetry), so its electric field inside the cavity is zero (by Gauss's law, for a spherical shell of charge, field inside is zero). Wait, no: the point charge \( +q \) at center, and the cavity's surface has \( -q \) uniformly distributed. So the electric field inside the cavity is \( \frac{kq}{r^2} \) (from \( +q \)) plus zero (from \( -q \) spherical shell), so total \( E_{\text{cav}} = \frac{kq}{r^2} \). Now, if we move the cavity's charge (but in the problem, is the cavity's charge moving? Wait, the question is about whether \( E_{\text{cav}} \) would change. Wait, maybe the scenario is: if the cavity's position relative to the conductor changes (but the cavity is spherical, and the charge is at the cavity's center). Wait, no— the electric field inside the cavity depends only on the charge inside the cavity and the symmetry. If the charge is at the center of the spherical cavity, the field is radial and depends on \( r \) from the center. If we move the charge off-center, the induced charge on the cavity's surface would no longer be uniform, so the electric field inside the cavity would change (because the induced charge's field would now have a non-zero contribution inside the cavity). But in the original figure, the charge is at the center. Wait, the problem's Part G: "The electric field within the cavity, \( E_{\text{cav}} \): would change / would not change". Wait, maybe the context is: if we change the position of the cavity (but the conductor is fixed), or change the charge? No, the charge is \( +q \). Wait, no— the key is: in electrostatic equilibrium, the electric field inside the cavity of a conductor with a charge inside depends on the charge inside and the symmetry. If the charge is at the center of a spherical cavity, the field is like a point charge. If the charge is moved off-center, the induced charge on the cavity's surface becomes non-uniform, so the electric field inside the cavity (the sum of the point charge's field and the induced charge's field) would change. But in the original problem, maybe the charge is at the center, and the question is: if we do something (like move the charge), but the options are "would change" or "would not change". Wait, no— maybe the problem is: when the charge is at the center, the electric field inside the cavity is determined by the point charge (since the induced charge on the cavity's surface is uniform, so its field inside is zero). If we keep the charge at the center (spherical symmetry), then \( E_{\text{cav}} \) is \( \frac{kq}{r^2} \), same as a point charge. But if the cavity's shape is not spherical, or the charge is moved, but in the given figure, it's a spherical cavity with charge at center. Wait, maybe the question is: if we change the position of the cavity (but the…
Snap & solve any problem in the app
Get step-by-step solutions on Sovi AI
Photo-based solutions with guided steps
Explore more problems and detailed explanations
would not change