Question

which of these best describes the connection between the 1933 national industry recovery act (nira) and the 1935 national labor relations act (nlra)?
the supreme court
declared both the nira
and the nlra to be
constitutional, leading to
stable relations between
workers and employers.
the supreme court
declared the nlra
unconstitutional, leading to
tension between workers
and employers.
the supreme court
declared both the nira
and the nlra
unconstitutional, leading to
violence between workers
and employers.
the supreme court
declared the nira
unconstitutional, leading to
the passage of the nlra.

Explanation:

To determine the correct answer, we analyze each option:

• The first option is incorrect because the Supreme Court declared the NIRA unconstitutional (not constitutional).
• The second option is incorrect as the NLRA was upheld as constitutional, not declared unconstitutional.
• The third option is incorrect because the NLRA was constitutional, and the NIRA was the one declared unconstitutional (not both).
• The fourth option is correct: The Supreme Court declared the NIRA unconstitutional. This led to the need for a new law to address labor relations, resulting in the passage of the NLRA (Wagner Act) in 1935.

Answer:

The bottom - left option (The Supreme Court declared the NIRA unconstitutional, leading to the passage of the NLRA.)