Question

which statement best supports the authors purpose in \children of the drug wars,\ which is to persuade readers that the united states should do more to help immigrant children from honduras?
\three years ago, about 6,800 children were detained by united states immigration authorities and placed in federal custody; this year, as many as 90,000 children are expected to be picked up.\
\these children are facing threats similar to the forceful conscription of child soldiers by warlords in sudan or during the civil war in bosnia. being forced to sell drugs by narcos is no different from being forced into military service.\
\judges, who currently deny seven in 10 applications for asylum by people who are in deportation proceedings, must better understand the conditions these children are facing.\
\by deporting them directly from the refugee centers, the united states would discourage future non - refugees by showing that immigrants cannot be caught and released, and then avoid deportation by ignoring court orders to attend immigration hearings.\

Explanation:

The author's purpose is to persuade that the US should do more for Honduran immigrant children. The statement about judges needing to better understand the children's conditions directly addresses a need for the US (judges are part of the US system) to take action (improve understanding) to help these children. The other statements either just present data (first option) or talk about discouraging non - refugees (last option) or make a comparison (second option) but do not as directly call for US action to help the children as the third option.

Answer:

"Judges, who currently deny seven in 10 applications for asylum by people who are in deportation proceedings, must better understand the conditions these children are facing."