Question

which best describes one main difference between rachel carsons silent spring and winona ladukes \a case for walawates\?
carson is concerned about the destruction of the entire environment, while laduke is only concerned about a certain part of the environment.
carson speaks of a possible future, while laduke discusses only what has happened in the past.
carson believes that the past was just as bad as the present, while laduke believes that the present is worse than the past.
carson offers facts and evidence to support her argument, while laduke appeals to readers emotions.

Explanation:

Rachel Carson's Silent Spring is a scientific work that uses facts and evidence to warn about the environmental impact of pesticides. Winona LaDuke's "A Case for Walnuttes" often uses emotional appeals to discuss issues related to indigenous and environmental concerns.

Answer:

Carson offers facts and evidence to support her argument, while LaDuke appeals to readers’ emotions.