Question

what kind of judicial decision - making acknowledges the power of judges deferring to the actions of the legislative and executive branches, except in cases where those actions are clearly unconstitutional?
judicial activism
judicial majority
judicial restraint
judicial constitutionality

Explanation:

To solve this, we analyze each option:

• "Judicial activism" involves judges being more proactive in interpreting the law, often not deferring to other branches.
• "Judicial majority" is not a standard term for this concept.
• "Judicial restraint" is the principle where judges defer to legislative and executive actions unless they are clearly unconstitutional.
• "Judicial constitutionality" is not the correct term for this decision - making approach.

So the correct option is the one related to judicial restraint.

Answer:

C. Judicial restraint