Question

what evidence(facts/details) is there in source 2 that supports the author’s claim (argument) that the land that the native south africans received could not support the population (the number of people)?
a the bantustans were grouped into ten units, most of which are made up of barren land.

b the government had a goal to “allow the homelands to develop greater self - government”.

c voting rights of native south africans are limited to the bantustan structures.

d the bantustans contain few major mineral deposits(natural resources) and few commercial and industrial centers (business centers).

Explanation:

To determine the evidence that native South Africans couldn't support their population, we analyze the options. Option D states that Bantustans have few mineral deposits and commercial/industrial centers. Limited natural resources and economic centers would mean insufficient means to support the population, as resources and economic activity are crucial for sustenance. Other options (A: grouping, B: government goal, C: voting rights) don't relate to the ability to support the population.

Answer:

D. The Bantustans contain few major mineral deposits(natural resources) and few commercial and industrial centers (business centers)