Question

4 what changes occurred as a result of the supreme court’s decision in miranda v. arizona? select all that apply. miranda rights were added to the constitution 5th and 6th amendments were written miranda’s case was retried police must inform suspects of their miranda rights miranda was found not guilty evidence can be thrown out if a suspect wasn’t informed of their miranda

Explanation:

• "Miranda rights were added to the Constitution" is incorrect as Miranda rights are derived from the 5th and 6th Amendments, not added as a new part of the Constitution.
• "5th and 6th Amendments were written" is incorrect as these Amendments were part of the Bill of Rights (ratified in 1791), long before the Miranda v. Arizona case (1966).
• "Miranda’s case was retried" is correct. After the Supreme Court's decision, Miranda's case was retried with proper procedures, and he was convicted again.
• "Police must inform suspects of their Miranda rights" is correct. The decision established that law enforcement must inform suspects of their rights (right to remain silent, right to an attorney) before interrogation.
• "Miranda was found not guilty" is incorrect. At retrial, Miranda was convicted.
• "Evidence can be thrown out if a suspect wasn’t informed of their Miranda" (assuming the full statement is about evidence exclusion) is correct. If a suspect isn't informed of Miranda rights, statements or evidence obtained improperly may be excluded.

Answer:

• Miranda’s case was retried
• Police must inform suspects of their Miranda rights
• Evidence can be thrown out if a suspect wasn’t informed of their Miranda rights