Question

if we leave out our tortillas - and by that i mean the language, history, cultural values and themes of our literature - the very culture were portraying will die. publishing has often forced us to do just that. trade publishers who control publishing in this country continue to have a very narrow view of the literature of this country. at a time when multicultural diversity is challenging the literary canon, the major publishers still are slow to respond to the literary output of chicano writers. after twenty - five years of contemporary chicano writings, there are still only three or four chicano writers who
why is the statistical fact presented in this passage an effective appeal to logos?
it contrasts the vast number of years for which chicano authors have been writing with the small number of authors who are accepted by big publishers.
it provides a precise number of chicano authors who have made an impact on large publishing houses.
it suggests logical reasons for why chicano writers have been writing for the past twenty - five years.

Explanation:

Logos is an appeal to logic. The first option contrasts the long - standing presence of Chicano authors (25 years) with the small number accepted by big publishers. This contrast is a logical argument (logos) about the disparity in the publishing world for Chicano literature. The second option just gives a number without the contrast (which is key for logos as it shows an imbalance). The third option is incorrect as the 25 - year fact is presented as a time frame, not as a reason for why they have been writing.

Answer:

It contrasts the vast number of years for which Chicano authors have been writing with the small number of authors who are accepted by big publishers.