Question

read the passage from sugar changed the world. in 1806, the antislavery forces brought a new bill before parliament that would limit british involvement in the slave trade. some of the most powerful testimony in favor of the bill came from former army officers who had been to the caribbean and had seen the courage of the former slaves and the horrors of slavery. the slaves spoke through the testimony of the very men who had gone to fight them. one member of parliament told his colleagues of the tortures he had seen in the islands. slavery was not an abstraction, an economic force, a counter in the game of world politics — it was the suffering of men and women. members of parliament were being confronted with the reality of slavery, just as audiences at clarksons lectures were when he showed shackles and whips. while parliament debated the new bill, clarkson and his allies went on lecturing, talking, changing minds all how do the authors use english history to support the claim that many people joined the antislavery movement for moral reasons? the authors explain the details of the bill that would limit british involvement in the trading of enslaved people. the authors use events from english history to describe the economic impact of involuntary servitude. the authors provide a primary - source quotation from a british abolitionist named william wilberforce. the authors summarize a newspaper article about ships in bristol carrying enslaved people.

Explanation:

The passage describes how in 1806, during the parliamentary debate on a bill to limit British involvement in the slave trade, powerful testimony came from former army officers who witnessed the horrors of slavery. This shows that people (the officers) joined the antislavery movement (by testifying) for moral reasons (seeing the suffering). The option about the authors explaining the details of the bill that would limit British involvement in the trading of enslaved people directly relates to this as it focuses on the bill - which is part of English history - and how it shows people's moral stance against slavery.

Answer:

The authors explain the details of the bill that would limit British involvement in the trading of enslaved people.