Question

read the lab report conclusion and then answer the question.
based on the data gathered, we measured the boiling point of water as 99.51 degrees celsius. the error against the expected measurement was 0.49 percent. sources of error may have been impurities in the water, contamination of the equipment, or human error in reading the thermometer. if we repeated the experiment, we might achieve more accurate results by sterilizing our equipment, using distilled water, and verifying that the thermometers readings are correct.
who is the primary audience?
scientists who study water quality
a writer for a popular science magazine
a high school science teacher
theoretical physicists

Explanation:

The lab report is simple, with basic scientific concepts and suggestions for improvement (like sterilizing equipment, using distilled water). It lacks in - depth scientific research language or complex theories. High school science teachers often guide students in basic lab experiments and would expect such a level of detail and simplicity. Scientists studying water quality would need more detailed analysis on water impurities and their effects. A writer for a popular science magazine might need a more engaging and less technical - but - still - accurate presentation. Theoretical physicists deal with complex theories far beyond the basic lab report content.

Answer:

a high school science teacher