Question

question 8 of 10
inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it:
a. begins with a big idea that is supported with specifics.
b. counts on the emotions of the audience to come to a decision.
c. comes to a general conclusion based on a specific observation.
d. includes support from unreliable experts to make a point.

Explanation:

Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations and then draws a general conclusion. This is in contrast to deductive reasoning which starts with a general premise. Since inductive reasoning is based on specific cases (which may not be fully representative), it is considered weaker. Option A describes deductive reasoning. Option B is about emotional appeal, not the nature of inductive reasoning. Option D is about the source of support (unreliable experts) which is not the core reason inductive is weaker.

Answer:

C. comes to a general conclusion based on a specific observation.