Question

pregunta 5 (2 puntos)
\if man in the state of nature is free, if he is absolute lord of his own person and possessions, why will he give up his freedom? why will he put himself under the control of any person or institution? the obvious answer is that rights in the state of nature are constantly exposed to the attack of others. since every man is equal and since most men do not concern themselves with equity and justice, the enjoyment of rights in the state of nature is unsafe and insecure. hence each man joins in society with others to preserve his life, liberty, and property.\
— john locke, two treatises of government, 1690
q = this statement provides support for the
a elimination of laissez - faire capitalism
b continuation of absolute monarchy
c formation of government based on a social contract
d rejection of the natural rights philosophy

Explanation:

La frase de John Locke explica que los individuos se unen en sociedad para proteger sus derechos (vida, libertad, propiedad) debido a la inseguridad en el estado de naturaleza. Esto apoya la idea del contrato social, donde personas se unen para formar un gobierno que proteja esos derechos. La opción a no se refiere a laissez - faire capitalism aquí. La opción b es incorrecta, ya que Locke no apoya la monarquía absoluta. La opción d es errónea, ya que Locke defiende los derechos naturales.

Answer:

c. formation of government based on a social contract