Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

Scan to solve math questions

QUESTION IMAGE

options (5) a standign army threatens citizens rights are inherent and …

Question

options (5)
a standign army threatens citizens
rights are inherent and do not need defined
the national government will hold too much power compared to states and individuals
protection of itnerests requires a standing army
rights should be listed in the constitution
match the statement with the group (federalist or anti federalist) that would hav
scroll more
federalist anti federalist

Explanation:

Brief Explanations

To solve this, we recall the views of Federalists and Anti - Federalists:

  • Federalist Views: They supported a strong national government. They believed that a standing army was necessary for protection (so "Protection of interests requires a standing army" is Federalist). They also thought that a strong national government was beneficial and did not see the need for a Bill of Rights (implied by not needing to list rights as inherent).
  • Anti - Federalist Views: They were wary of a strong national government, thinking it would hold too much power ("The national government will hold too much power compared to states and individuals"). They were concerned about a standing army threatening citizens ("A standing army threatens citizens"). They believed rights were inherent and did not need to be defined ("Rights are inherent and do not need defined") and also thought that rights should be listed in the Constitution (to protect against government overreach, so "Rights should be listed in the Constitution" is Anti - Federalist).

So the matches are:

  • Federalist: "Protection of interests requires a standing army"
  • Anti - Federalist: "A standing army threatens citizens", "Rights are inherent and do not need defined", "The national government will hold too much power compared to states and individuals", "Rights should be listed in the Constitution"

Answer:

  • Federalist: Protection of interests requires a standing army
  • Anti Federalist: A standing army threatens citizens, Rights are inherent and do not need defined, The national government will hold too much power compared to states and individuals, Rights should be listed in the Constitution