Question

4 multiple choice 2 points reasons for conducting peer review include all of the following except analyzing the experimental design pointing out possible bias identifying an illogical conclusion changing data to support the hypothesis 5 multiple choice 2 points a key component of scientific investigation is the review and critique of data by other scientists. this frequently leads to multiple explanations for the results and sometimes causes public discussion. which of the following is a benefit to society that is most likely derived from this process? increased funding for science as people take sides increased job opportunities for laboratory scientists decreased acceptance of findings based on poor investigations decreased emphasis on searching for answers to old questions

Explanation:

4.

Peer review aims to evaluate the quality and validity of research. Analyzing experimental design, pointing out bias, and identifying illogical conclusions are valid aspects of peer - review. However, changing data to support a hypothesis is unethical and not a part of peer review.

When other scientists review and critique data, it helps in weeding out poor - quality investigations. If findings are based on poor investigations, decreased acceptance of such findings is a benefit to society. Increased funding due to taking sides is not a scientific or societal benefit. Increased job opportunities for laboratory scientists is more of an individual or professional benefit rather than a societal one in the context of scientific integrity. Decreased emphasis on searching for answers to old questions is not a positive outcome.

Answer:

changing data to support the hypothesis

5.