Question

like a detective: using evidence to make a claim
4 more questions to go
danielle is getting ready to write an essay about the 1995 film version of romeo + juliet. she wants to make the claim that the film is more successful at connecting the audience to the characters emotions, so she sits down to read the play for the first time. what advice do you have for danielle?
danielle, you should know that the book is always better than the movie. you need to consider the complexity of written text versus the simplicity of the screen.
danielle, this is going to be a great paper. remember to research what critics said when the movie first came out so you have expert opinions to back up your claim.
danielle, you should definitely read the play before you make any claim about how it compares to the film. you need to consider your evidence before making a claim.
danielle, you are right on. its important to know what you are going to argue before you get lost in the evidence.

Explanation:

When writing an essay comparing a play and its film adaptation, it's crucial to have a solid understanding of both. Reading the play first allows Danielle to analyze how the film interprets and presents the original material. Considering evidence (like how emotions are conveyed in both) before making a claim ensures the argument is well - founded. The first option makes an unfounded generalization ("book is always better"), the second focuses on external opinions (critics) rather than her own analysis of the play and film, and the fourth is too vague about the relationship between knowing the argument and the evidence.

Answer:

Danielle, you should definitely read the play before you make any claim about how it compares to the film. You need to consider your evidence before making a claim.