Question

experts have linked the increase in teen car accidents to an increase in the use of social media while driving. teen drivers are using social media to take selfies while driving. this behavior causes dangerous driving situations that may result in deadly accidents. the only way to stop teen accidents caused by distracted driving is to block social media apps while a car is in motion. which statement best explains why this is an example of fallacious reasoning? the author fails to recognize other behaviors that cause distracted driving. the author uses anecdotal evidence that draws upon the emotions of readers. the author labels teens as irresponsible which is an unfair judgment. the author relies on rhetorical devices to create a picture and persuade the audience.

Explanation:

To determine the best explanation for fallacious reasoning, we analyze each option:

• Option 1: The argument claims the only way to stop teen accidents from distracted driving is blocking social media apps, ignoring other distracted driving behaviors (like texting, eating, etc.). This is a fallacy of oversimplification/ignoring other causes.
• Option 2: The passage doesn't use anecdotal evidence (personal stories) or appeal to emotions.
• Option 3: The passage doesn't label teens as irresponsible; it focuses on social media use while driving.
• Option 4: Rhetorical devices for persuasion aren't the core of fallacious reasoning here; the issue is ignoring other causes.

So the first option best explains the fallacy.

Answer:

A. The author fails to recognize other behaviors that cause distracted driving.