Question

the blood massacre. explain how this is a piece of propaganda. make to claims to build a argument. support each claim with evidence from the primary sourcer

Explanation:

Propaganda is information used to influence opinions. Claims could include emotional - laden language, one - sided presentation, etc. Evidence would be specific words or phrases from the primary source that show these characteristics. For example, if "The Blood Massacre" uses loaded terms to evoke strong emotions without presenting a balanced view, it could be propaganda.

Answer:

To build an argument that "The Blood Massacre" is propaganda:
Claim 1: It uses emotionally charged language. Evidence: The term "Blood Massacre" itself is likely to evoke strong negative emotions.
Claim 2: It presents a one - sided view. Evidence: Without seeing the full primary source, if it only focuses on one side of an event or issue without presenting counter - arguments, it is one - sided.