Question

based on source 12 and source 13, which statement about the relationship between afro - eurasia states is true?
some rival states used alliances and tributes to keep peace between stronger and weaker states.
some rival states used war to conquer a rival and absorb that rival as a part of the stronger state.
some rival states used trade to keep peace between their different cultural and economic systems.
some rival states used distance to isolate themselves from their rival states to keep peace

Explanation:

To determine the correct statement about the relationship between Afro - Eurasian states, we analyze each option:

• Option A: In the context of inter - state relations in Afro - Eurasia, stronger states often used alliances (to strengthen their position) and tributes (from weaker states as a sign of submission and to maintain order) as a means to keep peace. This is consistent with historical patterns where hegemonic or stronger states would establish systems of alliances and tributary relationships to stabilize their spheres of influence.
• Option B: While war was used for conquest, the statement's focus on "to keep peace" is incorrect as war is a means of conflict, not typically a primary method for peace - keeping in the context of state relations (except in the sense of conquering to end resistance, but the wording here is misleading).
• Option C: Trade between states with different cultural and economic systems was more about economic gain, cultural exchange, and sometimes power projection, not primarily to keep peace. Peace - keeping through trade was not the main driver of inter - state trade in Afro - Eurasia.
• Option D: States in Afro - Eurasia were highly interconnected through trade, conquest, and cultural exchange. Isolating themselves to keep peace was not a common strategy as most states sought to expand their influence or engage in interactions with others.

Answer:

A. Some strong states used alliances and tributes to keep peace between stronger and weaker states