Question

after reading the article, your friends are interested in learning about the statistics/research on the effect of banning cell phones in educational settings. so, you watch the video titled grades improve when cell phones are banned, but experts say distraction is not the problem.

how do the video and the article complement each other on the issue of cell phones in educational settings?

○ the article only incorporates one point of view, while the video incorporates multiple points of view.
○ the article and the video dont relate to each other in any way.
○ both the article and the video incorporate multiple points of view on the issue.
○ the article attempts to convince the reader that cell phones should be banned, while the video attempts to convince the reader that cell phones should be allowed.

Explanation:

To determine the correct answer, we analyze each option:

• Option 1: There's no indication the article has only one point of view, so this is incorrect.
• Option 2: The video and article are both about cell phones in educational settings, so they do relate, making this wrong.
• Option 3: Both the article (from the context of friends wanting stats/research) and the video (with "experts say" implying different perspectives) likely incorporate multiple viewpoints on the cell phone in education issue. This is consistent.
• Option 4: The video title says grades improve with bans but distraction isn't the problem, not that it's for allowing phones. The article's stance isn't given as pro - ban only, so this is incorrect.

Answer:

C. Both the article and the video incorporate multiple points of view on the issue.