Question

1. what is the best way for a peer reviewer to address problems in an analytical essay?

○ avoid bringing up any problems with the essay, only mention the essay’s strengths during peer review.
○ explain all of the problems with the essay right away, as soon as you start the peer review process.
○ describe and suggest solutions for the problems after describing the strengths of the essay.
○ write down all the problems and hand the list to the writer before starting the peer review.

Explanation:

In peer review, a constructive approach is best. Option C (Describe and suggest solutions for the problems after describing the strengths of the essay) follows best practices: start with strengths to encourage the writer, then address problems with solutions, which is helpful and motivational. Option A avoids problems (unhelpful), Option B explains problems without solutions (less helpful), Option D hands a list without context (impersonal).

Answer:

C. Describe and suggest solutions for the problems after describing the strengths of the essay.