Question

1. what is the best way for a peer reviewer to address problems in an analytical essay?

describe and suggest solutions for the problems after describing the strengths of the essay.
avoid bringing up any problems with the essay, only mention the essay’s strengths during peer review.
explain all of the problems with the essay right away, as soon as you start the peer review process.
write down all the problems and hand the list to the writer before starting the peer review.

Explanation:

For peer review of an analytical essay, a constructive approach is best. Option A (Describe and suggest solutions for the problems after describing the strengths of the essay) follows best practices: start with strengths to be positive, then address problems with solutions, which is helpful for the writer. Option B avoids problems, which isn't helpful. Option C explains problems immediately without context, and Option D hands a list without context, both less effective.

Answer:

A. Describe and suggest solutions for the problems after describing the strengths of the essay